| Re: Rexhall motorcoach | Pat | There nice, and I definitely like the design. Aerodynamic, smooth lines, flush fit slides, etc. The way a vehicle of this sort should have always been built.
BUT... have you seen the suggested retail price on these things? WOW!
With Rexhall's rep and past troubles keeping the factory doors open I think they're blowing it big time. |
| Re: Rexhall motorcoach | Christian B | We own a 1996 32' Rexhall Aerbus and love it. Great coach, not to stoked with the Ford (we just had to replace a radiator at $960 for the radiator only! Thanks Ford! Anyway - great coach, best we owned yet and if I were rick - we'd get the 2008 in a heartbeat! |
| Re: Rexhall motorcoach | Ronald B | We bought a 1996 32' Aerbus from a private party about 5 years ago and have not been unhappy with it. I LOVE the 2008 Rexhalls. They have finally designed the interior to take advantage of the full slides. If I had the money I'd buy a 2008 Aerbus or Rexair today. I want them to make a success of the new design.
Good mpg is going to be a key to class A sales in the future. Okay, quality too.
|
| 2001 Rexhall Vision | Meck Sklansky | We have a 2001 Rexhall Vision. We've had 3 coaches before this but this is the best. The only problems we had were with Ford chassis items during warranty but these were fixed. In 2004 we visited the Lancaster factory and were impressed with the factory and people. If we were buying a new coach it would be a rexhall but I think we'll probably stay with our Vision, why should we change? |
| Re: Rexhall Aerbus | geoff42 | I like the idea that Rexhall are adding an RV park to their service and sales center. I've had 2 rvs that I took back to the manufacturer for service (Carriage and Fleetwood) and in both cases I was very satisfied. I'm really interested in the rexhall I think it is the coach that would best suit us when we upgrade later this year. We're retiring and going to fulltime and we've been looking for the ideal coach. This looks good. |
| 2002 Rexhall Rexair | Leo Holmes | We've had our 2002 Rexhall since new and it's been very good. We had problems with slides leaking. We were able to take it back to the factory about 4 months after we bought it and they fixed the problem. After the repairs they really tested with a high pressure hose and we've never had a leak since. We really felt good about the factory treatment we received. We felt as if the technicians were on our side. They fixed a few minor items at the same time and they were fixed properly which we've never been able to say about dealer service centers. If you can get to take your RV back to the factory I think this is the way to go and Rexhall were fantastic. We're thinking about buying a new coach maybe next year and we've read lots of the RoTi reviews but think we'll probably go back to Rexhall. |
| 2008 Rexhall Aerbus / RexAir | Hank Marshall | I have been waiting for a RV manufacturer to build something very areodynamic and modern. This coach is perfect. Most of the new coaches look very boxy and retro in their front end designs. I would like to see Rexhall take this exact same coach and make a 32ft model. Gas will keep going up and people will stop buying the huge 40ft RV's and need options of a Class A that will save gas by being a 30 to 32ft model. The slide outs will make up the difference in the square footage. Hank |
| 1996 Rexhall RexAir | Dave in Dallas | Our first coach was a 96 Rex-Air. We loved it. Two years ago, we attempted to purchase a new Rexhall on a Ford V-10 chassis. We never could get a straight answer as to price. Nobody wanted to quote a firm
price. Glad to see the price on the ad. We'd have bought if we could have had that information. |
| 2008 Rexhall Aerbus / RexAir - exciting | Bernie | We have stepped out of a Newmar 5th wheel and the Rexhall has excited us to move into a motorhome. The things that really excite us are: Double full length slides, the gas pusher GM bigblock. We had a Chevy, crew cab dually with this engine and made the mistake of trading for a 350 Ford diesel and regretted that move terribly. People think they need diesels in trucks and motorhomes. All we found was that fuel costs were way above gas, diesels are expensive to maintain, you get stuck with water in the diesel, jelling of the fuel in cold weather, and last but not least the cost is extremely higher than a gas engine. If you are not a trucker on the road I don't believe you can justify the extra cost for many years.
This Rexhall excites me and if I have to have more power there is always a Whipple type supercharger for the GM bigblock and this would be a great option for this motorhome. I will probably by this motorhome if I can ever get to see one. We live in Wyoming. |
| Re: Rexhall Aerbus | C. Bell | The Rexhall is the most innovative design since the Classic 1970's GMC motorhome. This is a winner. I would like to own one. |
| Re: 2008 Rexhall Aerbus / RexAir | Tony K | I think Rexhall have hit a home run with this. I'm just thinking about how to pay for it ... |
| 1998 Rexhall Aerbus | Ken Barr | I have a 1998 Rexhall Aerbus 37' long with a 275 HP Cummins diesel. We've had it since new and have done nearly 65,000 miles. This has been a fine coach, a few problems but all sorted and we've maintained it well and it's given us very good service and a lot of pleasure. We have one slide which we thought was wonderful when we first bought it but when I look at pictures of the new slide arrangement I'm just amazed. 2 whole wall slides, why haven't other manufacturers done it? It gives the perfect arrangement. The interior pictures look real nice. I'm looking forward to the Workhorse UFO diesel option and then maybe it'll be time to upgrade my Rexhall. |